Virtual vs In-Person Executive Networking: A Complete Guide

Both virtual and in-person networking have their strengths, and combining them often delivers the best results. Virtual networking is cost-effective, global, and flexible, while in-person events build deeper, more personal connections.

Here’s a quick breakdown:

• Virtual Networking: Saves time and money, offers global reach, but requires more preparation to make meaningful connections.
• In-Person Networking: Builds trust and stronger relationships but is more expensive and time-intensive.

Quick Comparison

Pro Tip: Use a hybrid approach. Virtual platforms help you expand your network globally, while in-person events create lasting relationships. Focus on your goals to choose the right format.

Related video from YouTube

1. Virtual Networking

Virtual networking has reshaped how executives connect, especially since 2020. It’s now more accessible and cost-efficient than ever. According to LinkedIn’s Executive Insights, 78% of C-suite leaders regularly attend virtual networking events today – up from just 23% before 2020.

One of the biggest draws? The savings. The American Society of Association Executives found that organizations save an average of $1,200 per executive on travel and lodging for each virtual event. Take Salesforce as an example: their 2023 virtual executive roundtable series brought together over 5,000 leaders worldwide, slashing participant costs by 85% compared to their in-person events.

"Virtual networking has broadened access to global leadership opportunities. We’re seeing executives from emerging markets engaging with Fortune 500 leaders in ways that were impossible before", says Sarah Chen, co-founder of Beyond The Billion, a global consortium of venture capital investors.

Still, making meaningful connections virtually takes effort. A study by Microsoft Teams’ Enterprise Connect revealed that top virtual networkers spend 40% more time preparing before events and following up afterward than they would for in-person gatherings. This extra effort includes researching attendees, crafting targeted talking points, and staying connected through digital platforms.

Platforms like LinkedIn’s Virtual Events Platform are paving the way, hosting over 1.5 million sessions in 2023 with a 96% satisfaction rate. Features like AI-powered matchmaking and breakout rooms help participants form stronger connections.

That said, virtual networking isn’t without its challenges. Technical glitches and the lack of physical presence can make it harder to establish rapport. To address this, many professionals rely on structured approaches. For example, Goldman Sachs uses a "3-2-1" method: three pre-event connections, two scheduled one-on-one meetings during the event, and one follow-up within a week.

Looking ahead, new technologies are further transforming virtual networking. Platforms like Meta’s Horizon Workrooms are blending virtual reality with traditional methods, aiming to combine the best of both worlds.

sbb-itb-2fdc177

2. In-Person Networking

Even in today’s digital age, in-person networking remains a key way for executives to build professional relationships. According to data from American Express Global Business Travel, the average executive spends $2,800 per in-person networking event. This figure includes travel, accommodation, and registration fees, marking a 320% increase compared to virtual alternatives. Beyond the financial cost, these events also demand a significant time commitment, often spanning several days for travel and participation.

Despite these challenges, a 2024 study by the Professional Convention Management Association found that 73% of executives still prefer face-to-face networking for establishing lasting business connections. Meeting in person allows for trust-building through non-verbal communication and spontaneous interactions. For instance, at the 2023 World Economic Forum in Davos, 89% of CEOs said they created stronger relationships during informal moments like hallway chats and shared meals – something virtual platforms often struggle to replicate.

"In-person networking lends a dynamic that you just can’t duplicate online. The subtle nuances of body language and immediate feedback create an environment where trust develops naturally", says Laura Doman, Former Sales Professional.

The success of in-person networking often depends on the type of event:

To strike a balance, many organizations are blending traditional in-person events with virtual elements. This hybrid approach helps expand networking opportunities while keeping costs in check. For example, EY now hosts regional micro-events, offering high-quality networking options closer to executives’ locations.

"There is nothing like being physically present at an in-person session to ensure and encourage engagement and maximize learning", notes the Springer Nature Researcher Support Blog, emphasizing the increased focus and participation seen in face-to-face settings.

While in-person networking provides unmatched opportunities for building connections, the associated costs and logistical hurdles make it important to carefully weigh these benefits against virtual alternatives.

Pros and Cons of Each Format

Executive networking has changed a lot over the years, with both virtual and in-person formats offering their own strengths and challenges. A study by the Professional Networking Association (PNA) found that executives who use a mix of both methods see a 42% higher success rate compared to those who stick to just one.

Here’s a closer look at how these two formats compare, based on data from Fortune 500 companies and industry experts:

*Follow-up Success Rate refers to the percentage of post-event connections that lead to meaningful outcomes.

"Virtual networking has democratized access to global leadership connections, but it shouldn’t completely replace the irreplaceable human element of in-person meetings", says Jennifer Chen, Chief Strategy Officer at LinkedIn.

The tech industry has embraced virtual networking in a big way. For instance, Microsoft’s 2024 virtual events earned a 92% satisfaction rate while reducing networking costs by 67%. On the other hand, industries like manufacturing and real estate still lean heavily on in-person interactions. According to the International Executive Forum, 84% of $10M+ deals in 2024 were finalized through face-to-face meetings.

The key to successful executive networking lies in using both formats wisely. By understanding these differences, executives can create a strategy that aligns with their specific goals and needs.

Conclusion

Executive networking has changed a lot in recent years. According to Forbes, 92% of executives find virtual networking efficient, yet 85% still see in-person connections as key for building strong relationships.

Media Richness Theory supports this idea, showing that face-to-face interactions are better for building trust and understanding subtle communication cues. The best approach? Combining both virtual and in-person networking strategically. Virtual platforms offer convenience and broader access, while in-person meetings create deeper, more personal connections.

Here’s a quick guide to match your networking goals with the right format:

A hybrid approach often brings the best of both worlds, blending the efficiency of virtual networking with the personal touch of face-to-face meetings. By tailoring your strategy to your objectives, you can build meaningful connections that support your professional growth.

Related posts

• How to Build a Strong CEO Support Network in 2025
• 12 Ways to Maximize Business Growth Through Peer Connections
• 8 Best Practices for C-Suite Relationship Building
• Common CEO Networking Questions Answered by Experts